2. Gruber DP, Zimmerman GA, Tomsick TA, van Loveren HR, Link MJ, Tew JM Jr. A comparison between endovascular and surgical management of basilar artery apex aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1999 5;90(5):868-874;
3. Hillman J, Säveland H, Jakobsson KE, Edner G, Zygmunt S, Fridriksson S, et al. Overall management outcome of ruptured posterior fossa aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1996 7;85(1):33-38;
8. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2002 10;360(9342):1267-1274;
10. Mordasini P, Schroth G, Guzman R, Barth A, Seiler RW, Remonda L. Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms by using Guglielmi detachable coils: a 10-year single-center experience with special regard to technical development. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 8;26(7):1732-1738;
13. Sagoh M, Hirose Y, Murakami H, Mayanagi K. The outcome of early surgical management of ruptured posterior circulation aneurysms. Neurol Res. 1997 8;19(4):385-388;
14. Sanai N, Tarapore P, Lee AC, Lawton MT. The current role of microsurgery for posterior circulation aneurysms: a selective approach in the endovascular era. Neurosurgery. 2008 6;62(6):1236-1249; discussion 1249-53.
16. van der Schaaf I, Algra A, Wermer MJ, Molyneux A, Clarke M, van Gijn J, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 10;(4):CD003085
17. Yang MS, Choi CH, Lee SW, Lee TH. [A comparative analysis of the outcome of surgical clipping and endovascular treatment in the ruptured posterior circulation aneurysms]. Korean J Cerebrovasc Surg. 2008 12;10(4):551-555; Korean.
18. Yasui N, Hadeishi H, Nishimura H, Uemura K. Tohoku ruptured vertebra-basilar aneurysm study group. Cooperative study of ruptured vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms in the Tohoku district in Japan. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2003 5;43(5):219-226; discussion 227.