Forced suction thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke using the SOFIA Plus device

Article information

J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2022;24(3):241-248

Publication date (electronic) : 2022 August 22

doi : https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2022.E2021.12.002

Hyun Ki Roh¹, Min-Wook Ju², Hyoung Soo Byoun³, Bumsoo Park³, Kwang Hyon Park³, Jeongwook Lim^,3

¹Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Deajeon, Korea

²Department of Neurosurgery, Hurisarang Hospital, Daejeon, Korea

³Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea

Correspondence to Jeongwook Lim Department of Neurosurgery, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, 20, Bodeum 7-Ro, Sejong, Korea Tel +82-44-995-4736 Fax +82-42-280-7363 E-mail Jeongwook.lim@gmail.com

Received 2021 December 14; Revised 2022 March 18; Accepted 2022 March 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several prospective randomized clinical trials in 2015 demonstrated the effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large artery occlusion [1,2,4,10,21]. Retrievable stents are mainly used in randomized clinical trials. Thrombectomy devices are typically divided into stent and non-stent devices, and thrombectomy using Merci, a non-stent device, was reported to be less effective than stent retrieval thrombectomy (SRT) [18,22].

However, good results have recently been reported for suction thrombectomy using a large-bore catheter. Suction thrombectomy has several names, but the methods are similar [7,8,13,14,16]. Mechanical thrombectomy performed with a suction catheter is referred to as forced suction thrombectomy (FST). An FST using large bore and highly trackable catheters, among non-stent devices, has yielded good results [6,9,13,14,16,19,24]. Additionally, the recanalization rate of FST is reportedly higher than that of SRT [16]. Catheters must have high trackability to easily reach the lesion and a sufficiently large bore to engage the thrombus [8,16]. The SOFIA Plus (MicroVention Terumo, Tustin, CA, USA) has the largest bore of 6 Fr distal access catheter. Additionally, the proximal part reinforces more support, and the distal part is made very flexible to improve trackability because the wire braid is different for each part of the SOFIA Plus [28]. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the clinical results of FST using the SOFIA Plus device, which has all required characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board. The requirement for written informed consent to participate in the study was waived. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations by including a statement. The medical records of all patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy at our institution from November 2017 to July 2019 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Data summary

A total of 81 patients underwent thrombectomy, and the SOFIA Plus was used in 35 patients. There were 21 FST patients and 14 combined with SRT. The mean age was 68.6±14.2 years and the sex ratio included more males (22/35). There were 24 clots in the anterior circulation (ICA terminal 4, M1 segment 20) and 11 in the posterior circulation. The time from symptom onset to admission was 283 min, and from diagnosis of infarction to arterial puncture was 97 min. Intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator was used in nine patients. The patients’ demographic characteristics details are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline patient demographics and risk factors

Procedural result and clinical outcome

The average time from groin puncture to catheter to lesion was 10.44±5.06 min. The recanalization time from groin puncture was 17.31±7.44 min in FST alone, 32.83±21.21 min in combined SRT, and 21.04±14.53 min in total. The average time required to reach the SOFIA Plus lesions from the groin puncture was 10.44±5.06 min. The average number of attempts in the FST alone was 1.7±1.39 times. In the combined SRT, they switched to SRT after 5.4±2.48 FST attempts. In particular, FST alone was recanalized on the first attempt in 14 patients. The total recanalization rates of TICI ≥2b and TICI ≥3 were 100% and 77.15%, respectively. The recanalization rate with TICI 3 was 80.95% for FST alone and 71.42% for combined SRT.

Distal embolic occlusion occurred in five patients. Four patients were recanalized using the SOFIA Plus, and one patient was recanalized using the combined SRT. Procedural-related hemorrhage occurred in four subarachnoid hemorrhages post-thrombectomy brain tomography, but the amount was small and there was no clinical morbidity.

The initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 12.06±4.45 and it decreased to 7.57±5.48 at discharge. On average, the initial mRS score was 3.84±1.08, and 2.48±2.04 at 90 days after admission. Nineteen (54.28%) patients had an mRS score of ≤2 at 90 days after their admission. Two patients died 90 days after admission, and the cause of death was not directly related to stroke.

The results of forced suction thrombectomy with the Sofia Plus are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Summary of results for forced suction thrombectomy with the Sofia Plus

DISCUSSION

The treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion has been mainly conservative for a long time, but recent prospective randomized clinical trials reported in 2015 demonstrated superior clinical effects of thrombectomy over conventional medical treatment [1,2,4,10,21]. All these studies performed thrombectomy using a retrievable stent, and the use of the stent was suggested as a guideline for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large artery occlusion using thrombectomy [1,2,4,10,15,21]. However, suction revascularization has long been used in peripheral vessels, and a good effect of suction thrombectomy on intracranial large artery occlusion has been reported [8,9,13,14,16,19,24,28].

Advantages of suction thrombectomy over SRT include removal without thrombus fragmentation, faster combination with SRT, and less intimal injury [3,20]. However, it is difficult to reach a large-bore catheter. This disadvantage has been a major problem in the development of distal-access catheters. Previous reports on suction thrombectomy mostly resulted from the Penumbra system, but recently, thrombectomy with various distal access catheters was also reported [7,17,19,23]. To date, there are still reports of SOFIA 5 Fr use [11,19,23].

The first requirement for a successful suction thrombectomy is a large-bore catheter [14,16,24,25]. In comparison with the 6 Fr distal access catheter, the SOFIA Plus has the largest bore (0.070 inch) and suction force at the distal tip of the catheter (21.32 g) [5]. The aspiration rate of the SOFIA Plus is 285 mL/min, which is not significantly different from that of Penumbra ACE 0.68 [5]. However, the suction force of the catheter is important because blood flow becomes zero when the blood clot sufficiently engages the catheter [12]. The second factor was trackability, of which its determination is subjective. During FST, it is difficult for the suction catheter to pass through the siphon area where the curvature of the internal carotid artery is the largest. To solve this problem, the microcatheter and microwire should be navigated to the remote distal branch of the occlusion part, or the retrieval stent can be deployed to the distal portion of the occluded site. The suction catheter can be placed in the occluded site along the wire of the stent. However, this process is time-consuming and can damage blood vessels in the distal artery of the occluded site. In our results, the SOFIA Plus’s trackability suggested that the catheter rapidly and easily reached the lesion within 10.44±5.06 min of average time from the groin puncture to when the catheter gets to lesion. The trackability of SOFIA Plus for severely tortuous proximal vessels and distal embolic occlusion was relatively good (Fig. 1A). Jang et al. [6] performed an FST using Penumbra ACE for internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion and reported that it took approximately 20 min on average to reach the occlusion site. However, because this was a lesion limited to the ICA, it cannot be regarded as better than our results for most M1 occlusions. In our case, distal embolic occlusion occurred after FST in four patients, and all of them were recanalized using the SOFIA plus. Although it depends on arterial diameter, the FST can be performed even for M2 and M3 using the SOFIA Plus (Fig. 1B). However, we believe that the use of a balloon-guiding catheter is necessary to prevent distal embolisms. Table 3 summarizes the results of the comparison with FST using the other devices.

Fig. 1.

(A) Fluoroscopic image of SOFIA Plus placed at the occluded lesion via tortuous proximal vessel. (B) Fluoroscopic image of SOFIA Plus placed to M3 for distal embolic occlusion at M3.

Table 3.

Comparison of the present study with reported other suction thrombectomy results

Forced suction thrombectomy using a large-bore catheter has shown faster recanalization and better clinical results than a small internal catheter [14,16,24]. In previous studies, the recanalization rate of a TICI scale ≥2b in FST was reported to be 53–88% [7,13,14,19,24]. However, our results for FST alone showed a high recanalization rate of 100% for TICI ≥2b, and especially, 80.95% for TICI ≥3. In other reports, the time from groin puncture to recanalization reportedly varied from between 34-73 min, but our result was 21.04±14.53 min, 13 min shorter than the best result, and the FST alone was shortened by 24 min. In various reports, mRS ≤2 at 90 days after the onset of symptoms varied between 40-79% [7,9,13,14,24,25], and our results were similar at 54.28%. Rapid recanalization is important for the outcome of acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion; however, the presence of abundant collateral flow is the most important factor. Abundant collateral flow prolongs the window period of ischemic injury. Since the degree of collateral flow varies from person to person, fast recanalization is one of the factors that can make good prognosis possible.

In Jeon’s meta-analysis, if FST was selected first, the probability of using an additional device was higher than that of SRT. The combination of FST and SRT showed a high recanalization rate, but their outcome varied [11,15,16,27]. The transition from SRT to FST is time consuming, but vice versa, it is not. Since the combination of FST and SRT can increase medical costs, the device selected for recanalization should be selected by the neurointerventionist who is most confident of the device. In our study, only 40% of the patients used a second device.

The limitation of this study was that it did not provide an objective indicator of trackability, and there was a tendency for data due to the majority of M1 occlusions. We also needed to statistically compare the results with those of other devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the outcome of patients with large artery occlusion stroke is the time of rapid recanalization from symptom onset, rapid systematic brain imaging studies and rapid recanalization are required for patients with indications. An appropriate thrombectomy device should be selected for rapid recanalization. Thus, the SOFIA Plus is considered a suitable FST device for patients with large-artery occlusion stroke.

Article information Continued