Cerebral venous outflow disorders are diseases that impair brain venous drainage derived from stenoses intra- or extracranially, often leading to symptoms similar to those seen in idiopathic intracranial hypertension [
1]. Headache, tinnitus, dizziness, and visual disturbances are some of the common symptoms experienced by patients with these disorders. The IJV, an extracranial portion of the brain’s cerebral drainage system, can be compressed or occluded due to distinct etiologies, including thrombosis, vasculitis, or extrinsic compression. Extrinsic compression has been reported to occur by tumors, the digastric muscle, and near bony prominences such as the C1 transverse process and styloid process [
5]. The latter has been reported in several case reports and series. Clinically, the venous hypertension caused by this type of compression often presents with headache, dizziness, pulsatile tinnitus, and visual impairment, consistent with the above-mentioned cerebral venous outflow disorders [
10]-12]. It is well recognized that relieving the pressure from the stenosed section improves symptoms. Styloidectomy still predominates as the most common surgical procedure done in these patients [
9]. C1 transverse process resection has also proved to be a potentially effective treatment strategy [
4]. However, minimally invasive surgery is an increasingly popular approach in many vascular and cerebrovascular pathologies as they have been demonstrated to be less morbid, they decreased inpatient stay and postoperative complications. There is scarce data regarding pure endovascular treatment of IJV compression by a C1 transverse process [
6-
8]. Reviews have concluded that styloidectomy has a slightly better outcome compared to pure endovascular stenting, however, endovascular patient cohorts are small to make a clear conclusion regarding this surgical approach [
8]. Some authors have recommended a staged approach to treat styloidogenic jugular venous compression by first removing the styloid process and subsequently performing stent angioplasty if symptoms recur [
6]. Some others have referred to endovascular treatment as a future promise, emphasizing that it is effective, but complications and symptom recurrence are of concern [
2]. Upon the revolving controversy between surgical or endovascular treatment, the decision as to whether to resolve the stenosis surgically or endovascularly should rely on the whole clinical scenario, including compression severity, symptom severity, and patient preferences. In our case, the patient had daily disabling symptoms that prompted correction, however the patient completely refused any invasive surgical treatment. The possibility of treating endovascularly was proposed and agreed upon after further discussion. Although no guidelines are available for this particular clinical entity, we believe that endovascular angioplasty and stenting are a good option for cases in which compression is mild to moderate and the surgical approach is refused by the patient or otherwise in high surgical risk patients. Here we present a case of peripheral vertigo caused by an IJV compression caused by the C1 transverse process, in which stenting was successfully done and symptoms resolved without the need for surgical styloidectomy or C1 process resection.