J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg > Epub ahead of print
Sehweil, Goncharova, Nataraj, and Khandelwal: Hemorrhagic transformation following a malignant middle cerebral artery infarction

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to determine the frequency of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and evaluate its impact on the clinical course and outcomes of patients with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of 74 patients with malignant MCA infarction, aged 44 to 92 years (mean age 71.5±2.0 years; 54.0% female), admitted between 2017 and 2025. Conservative therapy was administered to 77.0% of patients, while 22.9% underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy. All cases of HT were assessed using computed tomography according to the ECASS I classification.

Results

In the study cohort, 15% of patients received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Significantly, among this group, 100% developed HT as a complication. Hemorrhagic infarction (HI) occurred in 81.8% of these cases and was asymptomatic, not worsening the clinical condition or neurological deficits. Parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) occurred in 18.2% and was associated with clinical deterioration and fatal outcomes. In patients not receiving IVT, HT was observed in 66.6% of cases: HI type 1 occurred in 33.3%, HI type 2 in 47.6%, and PH type 1 in 19.0%. No cases of PH type 2 were reported.

Conclusions

HT is highly prevalent in malignant MCA infarction, regardless of IVT administration, with the majority of cases asymptomatic. Consequently, these findings suggest that asymptomatic HT may represent a natural progression of large infarcts rather than a treatment complication. The results underscore the need for early diagnostic markers and improved management strategies for HT in malignant MCA infarction.

INTRODUCTION

Malignant cerebral infarction within the territory supplied by the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is characterized by extensive ischemia involving 50% or more of its vascular territory [8]. This extensive ischemic injury to the cerebral hemisphere precipitates substantial edema, ultimately leading to brain herniation syndrome [25,30]. Malignant MCA infarction is associated with a high mortality rate under conservative management, reaching up to 80% [3,8], which is reduced to 55% following surgical intervention [4,12,23,32]. The severity of malignant MCA infarction arises from both the extensive ischemic area and the occurrence of cerebral and extracerebral complications. Among these cerebral complications, hemorrhagic transformation (HT) holds particular clinical significance. According to ECASS I [5], HT is classified into two main types: hemorrhagic infarction (HI) and parenchymal hemorrhage (PH), each with subtypes: HI 1 (petechial hemorrhages at the infarct margins), HI 2 (petechial hemorrhages throughout the infarct, no mass effect attributable to the hemorrhages). PH 1 (hematoma ≤30% of infarcted area, minor mass effect attributable to the hematoma), and PH 2 (hematoma >30% of infarct zone, substantial mass effect attributable to the hematoma). Clinically, HT is classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic. A large volume of ischemic damage, as seen in malignant MCA infarction, is a significant risk factor for both HT and mortality [25,30]. Some authors regard HT as a natural process in the evolution of ischemic stroke due to blood-brain barrier disruption [2], while most agree that HT arises as a complication of ischemic stroke and reperfusion therapy following successful recanalization of ischemic brain tissue [28,29]. A large infarction volume is regarded as a contraindication for systemic intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Despite this, certain patients with malignant MCA infarction may still be administered systemic IVT if early computed tomography (CT) scans do not demonstrate ischemic changes in the MCA territory at admission within the therapeutic window [2,17,20,33]. According to published literature, up to 21.4% of patients with malignant MCA infarction undergo IVT [6]. The occurrence of HT further deteriorates clinical outcomes and prognoses [9,11], comprising 28.5% of all fatalities associated with malignant MCA infarction [18]. Therefore, ascertaining the frequency of HT and assessing its impact on the clinical course and outcome of malignant MCA infarction is of essential clinical significance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 74 patients with malignant MCA infarction admitted to a single center in Rostov-on-Don, Russia, between September 2017 and March 2025. The patients’ ages ranged from 44 to 92 years (mean age 71.5±2.0 years), and 54.0% were female. Ethics approval was obtained prior to study initiation to ensure compliance with ethical standards and patient confidentiality. Conservative therapy was administered to 57 patients (77.0%), while 17 patients (22.9%) underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). In 41.1% of these surgical cases, DHC was supplemented with infarctectomy and tentoriotomy, according to the method previously described and published by the authors [19]. Non-contrast multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) of the brain was performed upon admission, at 24 hours, and during follow-up to confirm ischemic lesions and exclude other causes of neurological deterioration. The lateral shift of midline structures was measured as the displacement of the septum pellucidum from the midline to the contralateral side, at the level of the head of the caudate nucleus, on horizontal MSCT slices. Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) was assessed according to the ECASS I (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study) classification. The pathogenetic subtype of ischemic stroke was determined using the International Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria [1]. Daily assessment of consciousness level was performed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and the severity of neurological deficit was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [24]. The volume of ischemia in the affected cerebral hemisphere was calculated as AxBxC/2 based on brain MSCT imaging [14,22]. Intravenous thrombolysis was performed within the therapeutic window upon admission, before radiological confirmation of the ischemic lesion on brain MSCT. Cerebral angiography was conducted in patients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy.
The inclusion criterion for the study was a volume of ischemic damage to the cerebral hemisphere ≥145 cm³ based on brain MSCT scan. Exclusion criteria included infarct volume in the brain hemisphere <145 cm³, concomitant malignancy, low consciousness level (coma) on admission, bilateral involvement, traumatic hemorrhage, brainstem ischemia, or underlying blood pathology, including coagulopathy. Criteria for surgical intervention included hemispheric ischemia volume ≥145 cm³, GCS score ≥9 on admission, and absence of decompensated aggravated somatic concomitant pathologies. To prevent thromboembolic complications, all patients received anticoagulant therapy at appropriate doses.

Statistical analysis

The data analysis used descriptive statistics methods, including determination of central tendency indicators (mean±standard deviation (x¯±sd), median (Me)), and proportions (%) for the qualitative feature manifestation frequencies. To compare continuous values with a normal distribution (means and proportions), the t-test was used. P<0.05 was considered to be the level of statistical significance. The Chi-square test was used to check frequencies in accordance with 2×2 tables (interrelationship of binary features). To assess the differences between the two independent samples, a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Statistical processing of the results was carried out in the Statistica 6.0 software.

RESULTS

Most patients were admitted with impaired consciousness, scoring between 9 and 15 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale (mean GCS 12.9±0.2, Me=13 points), which resulted from massive edema of the cerebral hemisphere. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort are summarized in Table 1.
The severity of neurological deficit according to the NIHSS at admission ranged from 9 to 30 points (mean score 19.2±0.5, median=20 points), while the maximum score during follow-up reached 38 points. Midline shift at the septum pellucidum level was detected in 14.8% of patients on admission, ranging from 1.38 to 6.18 mm (mean 3.4±0.4 mm); during follow-up, it increased to 1.1-28 mm (mean 7.8±0.6 mm; median=5.67 mm). Additional ischemic involvement of the anterior and/or posterior cerebral arteries occurred in 32.4% of cases (79.1% anterior, 38.0% posterior, 9.5% contralateral anterior, and 19.0% combined anterior/posterior involvement). To prevent thromboembolic complications, all patients received anticoagulant therapy. Hemorrhagic transformation occurred in 53 patients (71.6%): The frequency of occurrence of various types of hemorrhagic transformation within the general cohort is detailed in Table 2. Intravenous thrombolysis was administered for 11 patients with malignant MCA infarction (15% of the total group). Following unsuccessful IVT, one patient underwent DHC, one - endovascular thrombectomy. Intravenous thrombolysis in all malignant MCA infarction patients (100%) was complicated by the development of HT. HT of HI type occurred in 81.8% of them (Fig. 1), HI 1 - in 7 (63.6%), and HI 2 - in 2 (18.1%) patients. HI of HT type was asymptomatic and did not lead to worsening of the condition or aggravate neurological deficits. Symptomatic HT of the PH type developed in 18.2% (n=2) of patients (Fig. 1), one with PH 1 and one with PH 2. The development of HT of PH type has a negative effect on the course and outcome of the disease - it leads to the impairment of consciousness down to coma, the development of transtentorial herniation and, ultimately, to a fatal outcome. In our cohort study of patients, administration of IVT to malignant MCA infarction patients did not lead to regression (complete or partial) of neurological deficit. According to the data gathered by the authors, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 120 studies evaluating IVT outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes found limited efficacy in patients with large infarct volumes, such as malignant MCA infarctions, demonstrating minimal evidence of neurological deficit regression [26]. Conversely, in the subgroup of malignant MCA infarction patients who did not receive IVT, HT was less frequent, occurring in 66.6% of cases (42 patients). The comparative analysis of the frequency of occurrence of different types of hemorrhagic transformation based on whether intravenous thrombolytic therapy was received or not is summarized in Table 3. Moving beyond treatment type, hemorrhagic transformation in our cohort study also varied among patients with different pathogenetic subtypes of ischemic stroke, occurring more frequently in the cardioembolic subtype (79.3%). The frequency of HT according to the TOAST pathogenetic subtype is summarized in Table 4. Furthermore, when considering treatment, despite the greater effectiveness of surgical treatment compared to conservative therapy, the occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation differs. The frequency of hemorrhagic transformation is lower in patients receiving only conservative treatment (71.4%) compared to those undergoing surgical treatment (76.4%). Additionally, in patients who receive decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) without infarctectomy, the incidence of hemorrhagic transformation is 60%, whereas it is 100% in patients who undergo DHC with infarctectomy. The comparative analysis of the frequency of hemorrhagic transformation according to the treatment type is summarized in Table 5. HT significantly depends on the volume of ischemic damage to the cerebral hemisphere (with an increase in the volume of ischemia, the probability of its occurrence increases) (t-test=2.3; df=72; P=0.0251) (Fig. 2).
Midline shift significantly depends on the development of HT (t-test=8.8; df=71; P=0.0403); with the HT occurrence, the midline shift of the brain increases (Fig. 3).
Analysis revealed no significant relationship between the development of HT subtypes HI 1 (Kruskal-Wallis test: H (2, N=74)=2.66; P=0.2646), HI 2 (Kruskal-Wallis test: H (2, N=74)=1.83; P=0.4003), PH 1 (Kruskal-Wallis test: H (2, N=74)=0.67; P=0.7142), PH 2 (Kruskal-Wallis test: H (2, N=74)=2.08; P=0.3529), the course (the severity of the disease assessed by the GCS and NIHSS), and the outcome of the disease.
The overall mortality rate was 44.5%, with 45.2% in the HT subgroup (n=53) and 42.8% in non-HT patients (t-test: P=0.8514). The frequency of mortality varies within the cohort according to the type of hemorrhagic transformation, occurring more frequently in patients with the PH type. The comparative analysis of the mortality rate of patients according to the type of HT is summarized in Table 6.

DISCUSSION

Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a common cerebral complication of malignant MCA infarction, occurring in 67.2% of cases. It is associated with extensive ischemic damage to the cerebral hemisphere and the development of profound edema. Published evidence indicates that a large ischemic volume constitutes a major risk factor for HT [13]. In line with this, a significant correlation was identified in the present study between ischemic volume and the incidence of HT, demonstrating a clear increase in HT frequency with greater ischemic volume. Accordingly, malignant MCA infarction may be regarded as a predictor of HT development. Data collected by the authors revealed that prophylactic anticoagulation therapy did not exert a significant influence on HT risk, likely owing to the severe disability of the patient population. Similarly, a study conducted on 186 consecutive patients in Osaka, Japan, reported that thrombolytic and/or anticoagulant therapy did not significantly affect the incidence of hemorrhagic infarction (40.0% with therapy versus 40.7% without therapy) [16]. In our cohort study, we found that the frequency of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) was lower in patients who received only conservative therapy without IVT (66.6%) compared to those who underwent surgical treatment (76.4%). Additionally, the incidence of HT was 100% in patients who received decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) with infarctectomy, compared to 60% in those who received DHC alone without infarctectomy. We hypothesize that this difference may be explained by the ability of DHC to reduce intracranial pressure and increase cerebral blood perfusion. The administration of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with malignant MCA infarction may be complicated by symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (HT), which can result in a fatal outcome, consistent with the findings of several authors [28,31]. Specifically, HT of the parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 (PH 2) occurred exclusively in patients who underwent IVT and was associated with mortality, representing an indirect complication of successful recanalization. The occurrence of HT in malignant MCA infarction patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy underscores the necessity for identifying early biochemical markers capable of predicting the malignant nature of ischemic damage prior to verification by computed tomography. Asymptomatic hemorrhagic infarction types HI 1 and HI 2 were the most frequently observed forms of HT. The high prevalence of asymptomatic HT (81%) in malignant MCA infarction patients who did not receive IVT confirms its natural development in the ischemic area, resulting from disruption of the blood-brain barrier. These findings align with the conclusions of other authors [7,15,27]. The mortality rate among patients with HT-complicated malignant MCA infarction (45.2%) was slightly higher than that observed in non-HT patients (42.8%), which accounts for the absence of a statistically significant difference between HT occurrence and the clinical course or outcomes in this patient population. This phenomenon is likely attributable to the presence of additional significant factors influencing both the progression of malignant MCA infarction and patient outcomes [21]. Furthermore, malignant MCA infarction in the absence of HT is itself associated with a severe clinical course and unfavorable prognosis, primarily due to the extensive ischemic volume and the development of critical, massive cerebral edema.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides robust quantitative evidence of the high frequency (up to 71.4%) of HT in malignant MCA infarction patients, regardless of IVT use. The findings underscore the limited benefits and risks of IVT in large infarcts and reframe asymptomatic HT as a natural disease progression rather than solely a treatment complication. Overall, this study fills a critical gap by highlighting the need for early diagnostic markers and improved management strategies, advancing understanding and care of HT in malignant MCA infarction.

Limitations of this study

The relatively small sample size, attributable to the low malignant MCA infarction incidence, represents an objective limitation of this research, warranting further investigation. The obtained results open up prospects for planning of further treatment.

NOTES

Disclosures

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Fig. 1.
Complication of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. (A) Hemorrhagic transformation of the HI 1, (B) Hemorrhagic transformation of the HI 2, (C) Hemorrhagic transformation of the PH 1, (D) Hemorrhagic transformation of the PH 2.
jcen-2026-e2025-05-001f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Dependence of hemorrhagic transformation on the volume of ischemic damage to the cerebral hemisphere. Y, Volume of ischemic damage to a cerebral hemisphere, cm³; X, Development of hemorrhagic transformation; 1, HT occurrence; 2, HT absence
jcen-2026-e2025-05-001f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Dependence of the midline shift on the development of hemorrhagic transformation. Y, Midline shift; X, Development of hemorrhagic transformation; 1, HT development; 2, HT absence
jcen-2026-e2025-05-001f3.jpg
Table 1.
Patients cohort characteristics at hospital admission
Parameter Frequency of occurrence, n (%)
Right-sided infarct 38 (51.3)
Volume of ischemic damage 151.5 - 804 cm3 (367.3±18, Me=332.9 cm3)
Cardioembolic pathogenetic subtype 29 (39.2)
Atherothrombotic pathogenetic subtype 21 (28.3)
Undetermined pathogenetic subtype 24 (32.4)
Clear consciousness 25 (33.7)
Moderate stupor 16 (21.6)
Deep stupor 23 (31.0)
Sopor 10 (13.5)
Table 2.
General characteristics of the hemorrhagic transformation of patients with malignant MCA infarction
Types of hemorrhagic transformation Frequency of occurrence, n (%)
HI 1 21 (39.6)
HI 2 22 (41.5)
PH 1 9 (16.9)
PH 2 1 (1.8)

HI 1, hemorrhagic infarction type 1; HI 2, hemorrhagic infarction type 2; PH 1, parenchymal hemorrhage type 1; PH 2, parenchymal hemorrhage type 2

Table 3.
Comparative analysis of the incidence of hemorrhagic transformation taking into account the implementation of IVT
Types of hemorrhagic transformation Frequency of occurrence who did not received IVT, n (%) Frequency of occurrence who received IVT, n (%)
HT 42 (66.6) 11 (100)
HI 1 14 (33.3) 7 (63.6)
HI 2 20 (47.6) 2 (18.1)
PH 1 8 (19.0) 1 (9.1)
PH 2 0 (0%) 1 (9.1)

HI 1, hemorrhagic infarction type 1; HI 2, hemorrhagic infarction type 2 ; PH 1, parenchymal hemorrhage type 1; PH 2, parenchymal hemorrhage type 2; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis

Table 4.
Frequency of incidence of hemorrhagic transformation in patients depending on the pathogenetic subtype of ischemic stroke with malignant MCA infarction
Pathogenetic subtype Frequency of occurrence (%)
Cardioembolic subtype 79.3
Atherothrombotic subtype 76.1
Unspecified subtype 58.3
Table 5.
Frequency of hemorrhagic transformation incidence in patients with malignant MCA infarction, stratified by type of treatment
Type of HT Conservative treatment without IVT, n (%) DHC with infarctectomy, n (%) DHC without infarctectomy, n (%)
HT 42 (66.6) 7 (100) 6 (60)
HI 1 14 (33.3) 1 (14.3) 2 (33.3)
HI 2 20 (47.6) 5 (71.4) 2 (33.3)
PH 1 8 (19.0) 1 (14.3) 2 (33.3)
PH 2 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

HT, Hemorrhagic transformation; HI 1, hemorrhagic infarction type 1; HI 2, hemorrhagic infarction type 2; PH 1, parenchymal hemorrhage type 1; PH 2, parenchymal hemorrhage type 2

Table 6.
Mortality rate of patient with malignant MCA infarction in different subgroup of HT
Type of HT Frequency of occurrence (%)
HI 1 47.6
HI 2 45.5
PH 1 55.5
PH 2 100

HT, Hemorrhagic transformation; HI 1, hemorrhagic infarction type 1; HI 2, hemorrhagic infarction type 2; PH 1, parenchymal hemorrhage type 1; PH 2, parenchymal hemorrhage type 2

REFERENCES

1. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stoke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41.
crossref
2. Alzayiani M, Schmidt T, Veldeman M, Riabikin A, Brockmann M, Schiefer J, et al. Risk profile of decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant stroke after revascularization treatment. J Neurol Sci. 2021 Jan;420:117275.
crossref pmid
3. Berrouschot J, Streker M, Bettin S, Koster J, Schneider D. Mortality of space-occupying (malignant) middle cerebral artery infarction under conservative intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 1998 Jun;24(6):620-3.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Dasenbrock HH, Robertson FC, Aziz-Sultan MA, Guittieres D, Du R, Dunn IF, et al. Patient age and the outcomes after decompressive hemicraniectomy for stroke: A notionwide inpatient analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2016 Dec;25:371-83.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, Kummer RV, Zoppo GJD, Larrue V, Leasaffre E, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation within 36 hours of a cerebral infarct: Relationships with early clinical deterioration and 3-month outcome in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study I (ECASS I) cohort. Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2280-4.
crossref pmid
6. Funchal BF, Alves MM, Suriano IC, Chaddad-Neto FE, Ferraz MEMR, Silva GS. Intracranial pressure following decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant cerebral infarction: clinical and treatment correlations. Arq Neurosiquiatr. 2018 Dec;76(12):812-5.
crossref
7. Gao HM, Chen H, Cui GY, Hu JX. Damage mechanism and therapy progress of the blood-brain barrier after ischemic stroke. Cell and Bioscience. 2023 Nov;13(1):196.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer RV. ‘Malignant’ middle cerebral artery territory infarction: Clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996 Apr;53(4):309-15.
crossref pmid
9. He J, Fu F, Zhang W, Zhan Z, Cheng Z. Prognostic significance of the clinical and radiological haemorrhagic transformation subtypes in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2022 Nov;29(11):3449-59.
pmid
10. Honig A, Percy J, Sepehry AA, Gomez AG, Field TS, Benavente OR. Hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke: A quantitive systematic review. J Clin Med. 2022 Feb;11(5):1162.
pmid pmc
11. Jensen M, Schlemm E, Cheng B, Lettow I, Quandt F, Boutitie F, et al. Clinical characteristic and outcome of patients with hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in the wake-up trial. Front Neurol. 2020 Aug;11:957.
pmid pmc
12. Juttler E, Unterberg A, Woitzik J, Bösel J, Amiri H, Sakowitz OW, et al. Hemicraniectomy in older patients with extensive middle-cerebral-artery stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar;370(12):1091-100.
crossref pmid
13. Lindley RI, Wardlaw JM, Sandercock PAG, Rimdusid P, Lewis SC, Signorini DF, et al. Frequency and risk factors for spontaneous hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarction. J Stoke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004 Nov-Dec;13(6):235-46.
crossref
14. Luby M, Hong J, Merino JG, Lynch JK, Hsia AW, Magadan A, et al. Stroke mismatch volume with the use of ABC/2 is equivalent to planimetric stroke mismatch volume. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Oct;34(10):1901-7.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Montaner J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Molina CA, Angles A, Abilleira S, Arenillas J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase expression is related to hemorrhagic transformation after cardioembolic stroke. Stroke. 2001 Dec;32(12):2762-7.
crossref pmid
16. Okada Y, Yamaguchi T, Minematsu K, Miyashita T, Sawada T, Sadoshima S, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation in cerebral emblosm. Stroke. 1989 May;20(5):598-603.
crossref pmid
17. Pedro KM, Roberto KT, Chua AE. Saftery and outcome of decompressive hemicraniectomy after recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:50-8.
pmid
18. Reffat MI, Abdallah OY. Decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions: Outcome of 25 cases. Egypt J Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;33(19):1-5.
19. Sehweil SMM, Goncharova ZA. How I do it: Decompressive hemicraniectomy supplemented with resection of the temporal pole and tentoriotomy for malignant ischemic infarction in the territory supplied by the middle cerebral artery. Acta Neurochir. 2022 Jun;164:1653-7.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Sehweil S, Goncharova ZA. Thrombolytic therapy of cerebral infarction caused by an occlusion in the proximal segment of the middle cerebral artery. Russian Neurological Journal. 2024 Jul;29(3):41-8.
crossref pdf
21. Sehweil S, Goncharova ZA. Predictors of the course of malignant ischemic stroke. Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A.L. Polenov. 2024;16(4):81-9.
22. Sims JR, Gharai LR, Schaefer PW, Vangel M, Rosenthal ES, Lev MH, et al. ABC/2 for rapid clinical estimate of infarct, perfusion, and mismatch volumes. Neurol. 2009 Jun;72(24):2104-10.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Slezins J, Keris V, Bricis R, Millers A, Millers A, Valeinis E, et al. Preliminary results of randomized controlled study on decompressive carniectomy in treatment of malignant middle cerebral artery stroke. Medicina (Kaunas). 2012;48(10):521-4.
pmid
24. Spilker J, Kongable G, Barch C, Braimah J, Brattina P, Daley S, et al. Using the NIH Stroke Scale to assess stroke patients. The NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group. J Neurosci Nurs. 1997 Dec;29(6):384-92.
crossref pmid
25. Subramaniam S, Hill MD. Massive cerebral infarction. The Neurologist. 2005 May;11(3):150-60.
crossref pmid
26. Sun J, Lam C, Christie L, Blair C, Li X, Werdiger F, et al. Risk factors of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol; 2023. Feb;14:p. 1079205.
27. Sussman ES, Connolly S. Hemorrhagic transformation: A review of the rate of hemorrhage in the major clinical trials of acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2013 Jun;4:69.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Thomalla G, Sobesky J, Ko¨hrmann M, Fiebach JB, Fiehler J, Weber OZ, et al. Two tales: Hemorrhagic transformation but not parenchymal hemorrhage after thrombolysis is related to severity and duration of ischemia MRI study of acute stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator within 6 hours. Stroke. 2007 Feb;38:313-8.
crossref pmid
29. Toni D, Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, Sacchetti L, Sette G, Argentino C, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarct: predictability in the first 5 hours from stroke onset and influence on clinical outcome. Neurol. 1996 Feb;46(2):341-5.
30. Treadwell SD, Thanvi B. Malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Postgrad Med J. 2010 Apr;86(1014):235-42.
crossref pmid pdf
31. van Kranendok KR, Treurniet KM, Bores AMM, Berkhemer OA, van den Berg LA, Chalos V, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation is associated with poor functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 May;11(5):464-8.
crossref pmid
32. Vital R, Hamamoto PT, Braga GP, Ducati LG, Luvizutto GJ, Gabarra RC, et al. Acute stroke management decompressive hemicraniectomy in a South American population: Morbitites and outcome analysis focusing on age differences. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(3):101.
pmid
33. Xia C, Wang X, Lindley R, Delcourt C, Delcourt C, Chen X, et al. Early decompressive hemicraniectomy in thrombolyzed acute ischemic stroke patients from the international ENCHANTED trial. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug;11(1):16495.
crossref pmid pmc pdf


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
The Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery (JCEN), Department of Neurosurgery, Wonkwang University
School of Medicine and Hospital, 895, Muwang-ro, Iksan-si, Jeollabuk-do 54538, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2279-9560    Fax: +82-2-2279-9561    E-mail: editor.jcen@the-jcen.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons and Korean NeuroEndovascular Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next