J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg > Volume 27(3); 2025 > Article
Patel, Sujijantarat, Patel, Dmytriw, and Regenhardt: Navigating severe vascular tortuosity and cervical carotid loop management in stroke thrombectomy: A case report and review of the literature

Abstract

Endovascular therapy is the current gold standard treatment for the management of acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion. Despite this, the presence of severe vascular tortuosity and cervical carotid loops can hinder the success of the procedure. We present a case of an 83-year-old female presenting with acute ischemic stroke and extreme tortuosity including common carotid artery and internal carotid artery consecutive loops, as well as a tandem common carotid artery bifurcation thrombus with an M1 segment occlusion. Subsequently, relevant literature is reviewed regarding the technical management of complex thrombectomy cases. The endovascular procedure involved navigating through extreme vascular tortuosity using multiple endovascular tools for optimal reperfusion using delivery devices to facilitate the procedure. Challenges such as vasospasm and straightening of an internal carotid artery loop occurred during the procedure. However, successful thrombectomy was performed using adequate procedural techniques discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular therapy (EVT) is the mainstay treatment for acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion (LVO) [31]. More recently, there has been proven benefit for even patients with large infarct cores [2,8,33,34]. However, there are many factors that jeopardize the success of EVT including the location of the occlusion, underlying stroke etiology, patient comorbidities, and vascular tortuosity, among many others [15,32]. Unfavorable vascular anatomy presents a significant challenge during endovascular procedures. These include a tortuous arch, supra-aortic tortuosity, arterial loops, and proximal stenosis, which can complicate the ability to navigate endovascular devices and increase the complexity of the EVT procedure.
Here, we present a case of the technical difficulties encountered and the management strategies employed in performing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in an 83-year-old female patient with severe vascular tortuosity involving tandem lesions in the common carotid artery (CCA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA), and consecutive CCA and internal carotid artery (ICA) loops.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The patient is an 83-year-old female with medical history of bilateral pulmonary embolism, treated with thrombectomy three days prior, hypertension, aortic stenosis status post transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and Heyde syndrome. The patient presented with left-sided facial droop, flaccid paralysis of the left arm and leg, dysarthria, neglect, and sensory loss. Her National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 15. She was not a candidate for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) as she was on therapeutic anticoagulation with enoxaparin.
At an outside spoke hospital, the preoperative computed tomography (CT) showed an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 8 without intracranial hemorrhage (Fig. 1A) [24]. CT angiography (CTA) was performed revealing severe CCA and ICA tortuosity, along with tandem right CCA bifurcation thrombus (Fig. 1B) with right M1 segment occlusion and symmetric collaterals (Fig. 1C, D) [27,38]. The patient was transferred for emergent EVT [28].

Endovascular technique

The patient was emergently brought to the neuroangiography suite. After induction with general anesthesia, right common femoral artery was obtained.
Given arch tortuosity seen on pre-operative CTA, a Simmons Select catheter (Penumbra, Alameda, California, USA) was chosen. After the right CCA was successfully catheterized, an angiogram was obtained which showed a 360-degree loop in a proximal CCA (Fig. 2). Under roadmap guidance, the BENCHMARK BMX 96 guiding catheter (Penumbra, Alameda, California, USA) was advanced over the Simmons and Terumo and into the CCA (Fig. 2A, B). The Simmons and Terumo were removed and manual aspiration of the proximal right CCA bifurcation thrombus was performed through the BMX. Under roadmap guidance, the BMX over the Berenstein Select catheter (Penumbra, Alameda, California, USA) and the Terumo guidewire were navigated into the right ICA (Fig. 2C). Angiographic evaluation showed an additional 360-degree loop in the right cervical ICA, and a proximal M1 occlusion intracranially (Fig. 2C).
The first pass of thrombectomy in the right M1 was performed using a RED72 aspiration catheter with the SENDit system (Penumbra, Alameda, California, USA) over the Synchro 2 microwire (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) (Fig. 2D). The system was navigated through the cervical ICA loop and to the site of occlusion, where the RED72 catheter was advanced over the SENDit to the proximal clot face. Aspiration was initiated through the RED72 catheter and continued for 2 minutes. Post-first pass angiography showed interval revascularization of the right M1, with now an occlusion in the right M2 superior trunk (Fig. 2E). Simultaneously, the previously seen ICA loop was noted to have straightened, with development of severe vasospasm in this context (Fig. 2E). Verapamil was injected into the ICA through the BMX to relieve the vasospasm with minimal improvement. Given persistent spasm and straightening of the loop, gentle external neck manipulation was performed. While there was some improvement, the loop did not re-form and there appeared to be persistent spasm at the location. The decision was made to carefully cross the region with a microcatheter system with the intent to perform a second pass.
Under roadmap guidance, the Headway 21 over Synchro 2 was carefully navigated past the straightened ICA loop and region of vasospasm with minimal resistance. A microinjection was performed to confirm passage in the true lumen. Next, the 5 French Sofia aspiration catheter (Terumo Medical Corporation, Somerset, New Jersey, USA) was then carefully advanced over the Headway 21 and Synchro 2 past the stenotic segment and intracranially to the occluded right proximal M2 using the co-axial technique. This appeared to reform the pre-existing loop in the ICA (Fig. 2F). A second pass was performed via direct aspiration through the Sofia catheter in the M2 segment. The catheter was then slowly withdrawn from the patient under engine aspiration.
Post-second pass angiographic evaluation through the BMX showed Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score 2b reperfusion, resolution of vasospasm, and return of the pre-treatment configuration of the ICA loop (Fig. 2G, H). There was no residual thrombus in the CCA. A region of mild CCA stenosis was noted that did not appear flow-limiting (Fig. 2H).

Follow-up and outcomes

An magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed 24 hours later which demonstrated moderate infarct burden in the right MCA territory (Fig. 3), as well as asymptomatic, mild hemorrhagic transformation in the basal ganglia (parenchymal hematoma type 1, Fig. 4) [9,25]. The patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility. At the time of discharge, her NIHSS was 5 for mild left upper extremity drift, left lower extremity drift to the bed, and facial droop.

DISCUSSION

Although MT is the gold standard procedure for acute LVO, various challenges can hinder the success of the procedure [29]. This case highlights the challenges in EVT on multiple fronts. The presence of vascular tortuosity, tandem lesions, management of a straightened loop, and severe vasospasm increase the technical challenge of the procedure and require adequate navigation and management to achieve favorable patient outcomes.

Vascular access challenges in elderly patients

While EVT is considered to be a safe and feasible procedure in elderly patients [12], several challenges can be encountered during the procedure due to age-related changes. Vascular tortuosity becomes more profound with age [4,28]. These anatomical changes increase the complexity of the case and navigation of endovascular tools. Furthermore, elderly patients tend to have greater stiffness and calcification in their vessels. Arterial stiffness was found to be a predictor of poor functional outcome in patients treated with EVT [11,17]. Our case presents the challenges of performing thrombectomy in a patient with severe carotid artery tortuosity, a common occurrence in elderly patients. Navigating this required optimal endovascular tools and delivery devices to achieve adequate recanalization.

Tandem lesions

The term tandem lesions is used to describe severe stenosis or occlusion of either the proximal CCA or ICA, in addition to an intracranial occlusion [14]. Proximal disease of the CCA and ICA can vary in its severity and features, posing unique challenges in EVT that require individualized approaches for management [5,16]. Two mainstay approaches are often considered. The first, often referred to as the anterograde approach, is through first using balloon angioplasty or stenting to treat the proximal lesion before moving on to intracranial thrombectomy. In contrast, the retrograde approach prioritizes intracranial thrombectomy first, if the proximal lesion can at least be crossed, before later addressing the proximal lesion after intracranial reperfusion is achieved [35]. While each approach has its own advantages and challenges, the aim is to address both lesions [3]. There is further controversy about the use of stenting the proximal lesion acutely versus in a delayed fashion [37]. Many practitioners opt to place a stent if the residual proximal stenosis is severe or if it subsequently occludes on delayed angiography, while deferring for a later time when it may be safer to initiate antiplatelet agents in cases with mild stable-appearing stenosis [3,20]. Thus, the optimal management of tandem lesions in EVT remains elusive and depends on several clinical, anatomic, and technical considerations.

Navigating severe tortuosity

Arterial tortuosity has been shown to be a predictor of procedural complication during EVT [18,30]. In our case, the patient had not only extreme CCA tortuosity but also a 360-degree ICA loop which must be navigated. Due to the anatomy of the vascular structures, multiple endovascular tools were considered for the optimal construct. To navigate through the supra-aortic tortuosity, we first selected a Simmons Select catheter, which allowed for the necessary flexibility and support to navigate into the CCA successfully. After a proximal CCA thrombus was aspirated, we then utilized an aspiration catheter system with the SENDit delivery device. Other available devices on the market include the Tenzing 7 (Route 92 Medical, San Mateo, CA, USA) and the Carrier (Balt, Montmorency, France). These devices are inserted into the aspiration catheter to reduce the ledge effect and improve navigation through tortuous vasculature [19]. For the second pass over a microcatheter system, we utilized an aspiration catheter with a softer tip, in this case Sofia, in order to navigate past the 360-degree loop in the ICA. Another approach, called the “tightrope technique,” has been described to straighten tortuous vessels with a stiff guidewire [22]. Due to the highly variable proximal anatomy and degree of tortuosity among patients, some cases may also require the use of the “grappling technique” with a stent retriever [13,26]. While initially described with an antiquated device, it can also be performed successfully with a stent retriever. By first navigating a microcatheter system beyond the intracranial occlusion and deploying a stent retriever at the site of occlusion, the stent retriever and its pusher wire can provide distal support and straighten the vasculature, allowing the passage of an aspiration catheter through tortuous segments, often in the region of the ophthalmic artery origin. The aspiration catheter can then be advanced to the proximal clot face for combined aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy [36].

Vasospasm

Vasospasm is a common complication in EVT, thought to occur due to mechanical irritation and stress to the vessels from device manipulation [1]. In our case, vasospasm was observed following the straightening of a cervical ICA loop during navigation intracranially for thrombectomy in the right M1 segment. The use of intra-arterial verapamil was partially effective in relieving the vasospasm. Verapamil is a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that relaxes vascular smooth muscle, thereby reducing spasm [6,23]. Verapamil is infused intra-arterially proximal to the region of vasospasm. Doses vary based on the clinic setting and severity of spasm but typically range from 10-30 mg. Slower infusion over a period of 5-10 minutes while monitoring vital signs can help prevent unwanted hemodynamic side effects. Other agents that are commonly employed include milrinone and nicardipine [7]. These agents are often infused intra-arterially over the course of several minutes proximal to region of spasm.

Management of a straightened loop

In our case, careful navigation of the devices through arterial loops resulted in straightening of a cervical ICA loop. Loop straightening can alter the true anatomy of the patient and result in complications such as dissection and vasospasm. In our patient, the ICA loop was straightened upon careful navigation of microcatheter system and softer aspiration catheter. Initially, straightening of the ICA loop was associated with the appearance of severe vasospasm. When there was only minimal improvement with intra-arterial verapamil and external massage of the neck, a decision was made to navigate through the affected region to perform a second pass of thrombectomy. After initially crossing the straightened loop and region of vasospasm, a microinjection was performed to confirm access to the true arterial lumen. It was then possible to advance a softer aspiration catheter over the microcatheter system through this region. Ultimately, it appeared that the flexible and smaller Sofia catheter may have helped to mechanically restore the ICA to its true pre-procedural state. There are limited reports of techniques to restore a straightened loop to its native state in the existing literature. Early reports include a description of open surgical approaches [21]. The paucity of existing literature may relate to the heterogenous anatomy and relatively rarity of an artery to fail to return to its native configuration after endovascular manipulation [10].

CONCLUSIONS

This case and review of the literature highlights multiple challenges that can be encountered during EVT for ischemic stroke. The discussion emphasizes the importance of individualized approaches in managing the technical aspects of navigating complex vascular anatomies.

NOTES

Ethical approval and informed consent statements:

Review of the case details was approved by the local institutional review board. Informed consent was waived per standard policy for case reports given minimal patient risk of de-identified data.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no directly related conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/ or publication of this article, but they wished to list the following disclosures. ABP has served as consultant for Medtronic, MicroVention, and Penumbra. RWR has received research grant funding from National Institutes of Health, Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, and Heitman Foundation for stroke, has served on a DSMB for a trial sponsored by Rapid Medical, has served as consultant for Genomadix, and has served as site PI for studies sponsored by MicroVention and Penumbra.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Fig. 1.
(A) Pre-procedural CT revealed Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 8 without intracranial hemorrhage (arrow indicates early ischemia). CT angiography (CTA) showed severe CCA and ICA tortuosity, along with tandem right CCA bifurcation thrombus (B, arrow) and a right M1 segment occlusion (C and D, arrows). CT, computed tomography; CCA, common carotid artery; ICA, internal carotid artery
jcen-2025-e2024-11-004f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
(A, B) After catheterization of the CCA, overcoming the proximal CCA loop with the BMX catheter (lower arrows), and aspiration at the distal CCA location, subsequent CCA angiography revealed a second cervical ICA 360-degree loop (upper arrows). (C) Post-proximal CCA thrombus aspiration, angiography revealed M1 occlusion intracranially (arrow). (D) Navigation of the RED72 aspiration catheter with the SENDit system through the second cervical ICA loop to the site of occlusion for the first pass (arrow indicates catheter tip). (E) Postfirst pass angiogram revealed interval revascularization of the right M1, with now an occlusion in the right M2 superior trunk (upper arrow). The previously seen ICA loop was noted to have straightened, with development of severe vasospasm (lower arrow; compare C versus E). (F) After infusion of verapamil and neck manipulation with persistent spasm, the decision was made to carefully advance the microcatheter system past the region of vasospasm (lower arrow). Then, the Sofia aspiration catheter was carefully advanced past the stenotic segment and intracranially (upper arrow). This maneuver reformed the pre-existing loop in the ICA, which resolved the vasospasm. (G) A second pass was performed, resulting in a TICI2b reperfusion (arrow). There was also successful reformation of the proximal ICA loop and resolution of vasospasm. (H) Final proximal CCA angiography demonstrated there was no residual thrombus in the distal CCA, which had only mild residual CCA stenosis that did not appear flow-limiting. The ICA loop remained in its native pre-procedure configuration without evidence of complication (arrow). CCA, common carotid artery; ICA, internal carotid artery
jcen-2025-e2024-11-004f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Post-procedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence of the MRI demonstrated moderate infarct burden in the right MCA territory (arrows indicate infarct in right MCA region). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MCA, middle cerebral artery
jcen-2025-e2024-11-004f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Post-procedural susceptibility-weighed imaging (SWI) sequence demonstrated asymptomatic, parenchymal hematoma type 1 (arrow indicates hematoma).
jcen-2025-e2024-11-004f4.jpg

REFERENCES

1. Balami JS, White PM, McMeekin PJ, Ford GA, Buchan AM. Complications of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: Prevention and management. Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc. 2018 Jun;13(4):348-61.
crossref pdf
2. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan;372(1):11-20.
pmid
3. Deliktas Y, Derraz I, Finitsis S, Caroff J, Bourcier R, Soize S, et al. Clinical and safety outcomes of acute stenting plus thrombectomy for carotid tandem lesions with large ischemic core. J Neurointerventional Surg. 2024 Jun;jnis-2024-021517.
crossref
4. Del Corso L, Moruzzo D, Conte B, Agelli M, Romanelli AM, Pastine F, et al. Tortuosity, kinking, and coiling of the carotid artery: Expression of atherosclerosis or aging? Angiology. 1998 May;49(5):361-71.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Feil K, Herzberg M, Dorn F, Tiedt S, Küpper C, Thunstedt DC, et al. Tandem lesions in anterior circulation stroke. Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1265-75.
pmid
6. Feng L, Fitzsimmons BF, Young WL, Berman MF, Lin E, Aagaard BDL, et al. Intraarterially administered verapamil as adjunct therapy for cerebral vasospasm: Safety and 2-year experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Sep;23(8):1284-90.
pmid pmc
7. Fraticelli AT, Cholley BP, Losser MR, Saint Maurice JP, Payen D. Milrinone for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2008 Mar;39(3):893-8.
crossref pmid
8. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar;372(11):1019-30.
pmid
9. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet Lond Engl. 1998 Oct;352(9136):1245-51.
10. Han HC. Twisted blood vessels: Symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms. J Vasc Res. 2012 Mar;49(3):185-97.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Han M, Joo H, Lee H, Heo J, Jung JW, Kim YD, et al. Arterial stiffness predicts the outcome of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Clin Med. 2024 Jul;13(14):4198.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Hilditch CA, Nicholson P, Murad MH, Rabinstein A, Schaafsma J, Pikula A, et al. Endovascular management of acute stroke in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):887-91.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Hui FK, Hussain MS, Spiotta A, Bhalla T, Toth G, Moskowitz SI, et al. Merci retrievers as access adjuncts for reperfusion catheters: The grappling hook technique. Neurosurgery. 2012 Feb;70(2):456-60; discussion 460.
pmid
14. Jadhav AP, Zaidat OO, Liebeskind DS, Yavagal DR, Haussen DC, Hellinger FR, et al. Emergent management of tandem lesions in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):428-33.
crossref pmid
15. Jolugbo P, Ariëns RAS. Thrombus composition and efficacy of thrombolysis and thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1131-42.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Kim HW, Regenhardt RW, D’Amato SA, Nahhas MI, Dmytriw AA, Hirsch JA, et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a summary of current state of evidence for revascularization and emerging high-risk features. J Neurointerventional Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):717-22.
crossref
17. Kim J, Cha MJ, Lee DH, Lee HS, Nam CM, Nam HS, et al. The association between cerebral atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in acute ischemic stroke. Atherosclerosis. 2011 Dec 1;219(2):887-91.
crossref pmid
18. Koge J, Tanaka K, Yoshimoto T, Shiozawa M, Kushi Y, Ohta T, et al. Internal carotid artery tortuosity: Impact on mechanical thrombectomy. Stroke. 2022 Aug;53(8):2458-67.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Koneru M, Badger CA, Settecase F, English JD, Kim J, Khangura RS, et al. Tenzing 7 Delivery Catheter Performance Across Tortuosity Indices. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2024 Jul;4(4):e001351.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Nolan NM, Regenhardt RW, Koch MJ, Raymond SB, Stapleton CJ, Rabinov JD, et al. Treatment approaches and outcomes for acute anterior circulation stroke patients with tandem lesions. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc. 2021 Feb;30(2):105478.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Pauliukas PA, Barkauskas EM. [Surgical technic of straightening kinks of the internal carotid arteries]. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 1989 Dec;(12):12-8.
pmid
22. Pelle G, Andresciani F, Messina M, Ciacciarelli A, Notarianni E, Siniscalchi R, et al. Endovascular straightening of the internal carotid artery during mechanical thrombectomy: The “tightrope technique.”. J Endovasc Ther. 2023 [cited 2024 Sep 8]. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15910199231205045.
crossref pdf
23. Pomerantz RM, Kuntz RE, Diver DJ, Safian RD, Baim DS. Intracoronary verapamil for the treatment of distal microvascular coronary artery spasm following PTCA. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1991 Dec;24(4):283-5.
crossref pmid
24. Regenhardt RW, Awad A, Kraft AW, Rosenthal JA, Dmytriw AA, Vranic JE, et al. Characterizing reasons for stroke thrombectomy ineligibility among potential candidates transferred in a hub-and-spoke network. Stroke Hoboken NJ. 2022 Sep;2(5):e000282.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Regenhardt RW, Bonkhoff AK, Bretzner M, Etherton MR, Das AS, Hong S, et al. Association of infarct topography and outcome after endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2022 Mar;98(11):e1094-103.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Regenhardt RW, Kozberg MG, Dmytriw AA, Vranic JE, Stapleton CJ, Silverman SB, et al. Bow hunter’s syndrome. Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):e26-9.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Regenhardt RW, Lev MH, He J, Dmytriw AA, Vranic JE, Rabinov JD, et al. Symmetric collateral pattern on CTA predicts favorable outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke. PloS One. 2023 May;18(5):e0284260.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Regenhardt RW, Rosenthal JA, Dmytriw AA, Vranic JE, Bonkhoff AK, Bretzner M, et al. Direct to angio-suite large vessel occlusion transfers achieve faster arrival-to-puncture times and improved outcomes. Stroke Hoboken NJ. 2022 Nov;2(6):e000327.
29. Regenhardt RW, Turner AC, Hirsch JA, Young MJ, Alotaibi NM, Stapleton CJ, et al. Sex-specific differences in presentations and determinants of outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke. J Neurol. 2022 Jan;269(1):307-15.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Saber H, Colby GP, Mueller‐Kronast N, Aziz‐Sultan MA, Klucznik R, Saver JL, et al. Arterial Tortuosity Is a Potent Determinant of Safety in Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2024 Mar;4(3):e001178.
crossref pmid pmc
31. Sahoo A, Abdalkader M, Yamagami H, Huo X, Sun D, Jia B, et al. Endovascular therapy for acute stroke: New evidence and indications. JNET J Neuroendovascular Ther. 2023;17(11):232-42.
crossref pmid pmc
32. Saposnik G, Menon BK, Kashani N, Wilson AT, Yoshimura S, Campbell BCV, et al. Factors associated with the decision-making on endovascular thrombectomy for the management of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2441-7.
crossref pmid
33. Sarraj A, Hassan AE, Abraham MG, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Kasner SE, Hussain MS, et al. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr;388(14):1259-71.
pmid
34. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun;372(24):2285-95.
crossref pmid
35. Scarcia L, Colò F, Alexandre AM, Brunetti V, Pedicelli A, Arba F, et al. Effects of emergent carotid stenting performed before or after mechanical thrombectomy in the endovascular management of patients with tandem lesions: A multicenter retrospective matched analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jan 8;46(1):96-101.
crossref pmid pmc
36. Siegler JE, Shaikh H, Khalife J, Oak S, Zhang L, Abdalkader M, et al. Aspiration versus stent‐retriever as first‐line endovascular therapy technique for primary medium and distal intracranial occlusions: A propensity‐score matched multicenter analysis. Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology. 2023 Jul;3(6):e000931.
37. Simon SR, Knapen RRMM, Truijman MTB, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Wagemans BAJM, van Zwam WH, et al. Timing of acute carotid artery stenting for tandem lesions in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A maastricht stroke quality registry (MaSQ-Registry) study. Interv Neuroradiol J Peritherapeutic Neuroradiol Surg Proced Relat Neurosci. 2024 Apr;15910199241245166.
crossref pdf
38. Yu AT, Regenhardt RW, Whitney C, Schwamm LH, Patel AB, Stapleton CJ, et al. CTA protocols in a telestroke network improve efficiency for both spoke and hub hospitals. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Mar;42(3):435-40.
crossref pmid pmc


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
The Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery (JCEN), Department of Neurosurgery, Wonkwang University
School of Medicine and Hospital, 895, Muwang-ro, Iksan-si, Jeollabuk-do 54538, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2279-9560    Fax: +82-2-2279-9561    E-mail: editor.jcen@the-jcen.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons and Korean NeuroEndovascular Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next